0.00/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.10 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.11/0.30 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu 0.11/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.11/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.11/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.11/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.11/0.30 % CPULimit : 1440 0.11/0.30 % WCLimit : 180 0.11/0.30 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 06:14:54 EDT 2024 0.11/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.17/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zPALYgrMpy/E---3.1_900.p 0.17/0.44 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # sh4l with pid 991 completed with status 0 0.17/0.44 # Result found by sh4l 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.44 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # new_ho_10 with pid 995 completed with status 0 0.17/0.44 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNFFN. 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # Starting sh4l with 180s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied 0.17/0.44 # Search class: HGHNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN 0.17/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 0.17/0.44 # Starting new_ho_10 with 109s (1) cores 0.17/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.17/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.17/0.44 0.17/0.44 # Proof found! 0.17/0.44 # SZS status Theorem 0.17/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_22, type, b: $i). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_23, type, cP: $i > $o). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_24, type, a: $i). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_25, type, d: $i). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_26, type, cQ: $i > $o). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_27, type, c: $i). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_28, type, cR: $i > $o). 0.17/0.44 thf(decl_29, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.17/0.44 thf(cTHM119, conjecture, ~(((![X1:$i]:((((cP @ X1)|(cR @ X1))&(cQ @ X1)))&(~((cP @ b))|~((cP @ a))))&![X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((cP @ X2)|~((cQ @ X2))|~((cQ @ c))|~((cQ @ d))|~((cQ @ X3))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zPALYgrMpy/E---3.1_900.p', cTHM119)). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(~(((![X1:$i]:((((cP @ X1)|(cR @ X1))&(cQ @ X1)))&(~(cP @ b)|~(cP @ a)))&![X2:$i]:(?[X3:$i]:(((cP @ X2)|~(cQ @ X2)|~(cQ @ c)|~(cQ @ d)|~(cQ @ X3))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM119])])). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i, X8:$i]:((((((cP @ X7)|(cR @ X7))&(cQ @ X7))&(~(cP @ b)|~(cP @ a)))&((cP @ X8)|~(cQ @ X8)|~(cQ @ c)|~(cQ @ d)|~(cQ @ esk1_0)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])])). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((cP @ X1)|~((cQ @ X1))|~((cQ @ c))|~((cQ @ d))|~((cQ @ esk1_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cQ @ X1)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (~((cP @ b))|~((cP @ a))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((cP @ X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_4]), c_0_4]), c_0_4])])). 0.17/0.44 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6]), c_0_6])]), ['proof']). 0.17/0.44 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.17/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 8 0.17/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses : 11 0.17/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 7 0.17/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4 0.17/0.44 # Processed clauses : 4 0.17/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.17/0.44 # ...subsumed : 0 0.17/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 4 0.17/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.17/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.17/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.17/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 2 0.17/0.44 # Generated clauses : 0 0.17/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0 0.17/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.17/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.17/0.44 # Paramodulations : 0 0.17/0.44 # Factorizations : 0 0.17/0.44 # NegExts : 0 0.17/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.17/0.44 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.17/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 7 0.17/0.44 # ...of those cached : 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.17/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.17/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.17/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.17/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 2 0.17/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2 0.17/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.17/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 0 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0 0.17/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0 0.17/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 0 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.17/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 2 0.17/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0 0.17/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.17/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.17/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0 0.17/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3 0.17/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 0.17/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 4 0.17/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0 0.17/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 428 0.17/0.44 # Search garbage collected termcells : 67 0.17/0.44 0.17/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.002 s 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.004 s 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages 0.17/0.44 0.17/0.44 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.17/0.44 # User time : 0.002 s 0.17/0.44 # System time : 0.004 s 0.17/0.44 # Total time : 0.006 s 0.17/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages 0.17/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting 0.17/0.44 % E exiting 0.17/0.44 EOF